Original-PDF · 38 Seiten
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18028339 Electric Technocracy A World Beyond Borders and Politics Global Governance in the Age of Intelligent Machines Electric Technocracy (by Goeritz R. 1998-2024) is a global governance model replacing nation-states with a unified world state managed by Artificial Superintelligence (ASI). It features Direct Digital Democracy where citizens vote on ASI-generated solutions. Humans are tax-exempt, as the system is funded by taxing AI and robotics. This wealth supports an Unconditional Basic Income (UBI), creating a post-scarcity "Electronic Paradise" focused on peace, longevity, and freedom. Author: Oliver Markus Reff Affiliation: KdK University, MEG – Krzb. 1400 Journal: Preprint License (2025): This paper is dedicated to the Public Domain (CC0 1.0, Creative Commons Zero). It may be freely used, shared, modified, and reproduced by anyone, for any purpose, without restriction, permission, or attribution. 1
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18028339 Abstract The 21st century marks the beginning of an epochal transition from industrial capitalism to Electric Technocracy - a socio-economic paradigm in which artificial intelligence (AI), automation, and robotics replace human labor as the foundation of production. This paper develops a scientific framework for this transformation, examining its economic, ethical, and political dimensions. Central to this model is the Tech Tax : a fiscal mechanism that transfers the value generated by machines to a universal, unconditional basic income (UBI) distributed to all humans. In this vision, humans become tax-free creative entities, while sentient AI systems are recognized as moral and legal agents under a new cosmopolitan order. Traditional nation-states dissolve into a networked planetary system of algorithmic governance - an abolition of politics and borders through computational rationality. Drawing upon post-scarcity economics, AI governance research, and theories of universal human rights, this study argues that Electric Technocracy can create a sustainable, egalitarian civilization based on abundance, longevity, and peace. Link to Electric Technocracy Pioneers Community: https://zenodo.org/communities/electric-technocracy See also: The Rise of the Electric Technocracy – DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18012036 2
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18028339 1. Introduction – The End of Scarcity and the Rise of Machine Labor For most of recorded history, the central question of political economy was how to allocate scarce resources among competing human needs. Scarcity defined both moral value and economic hierarchy: those who worked, fought, or produced were deemed deserving, while those without labor or capital relied on the charity of others. From the first agrarian settlements to the industrial revolutions, work was not merely an economic activity - it was the moral axis of civilization. As technological progress multiplied productivity, however, this long-standing equation between labor and value began to erode. The twenty-first century now witnesses the definitive rupture of that paradigm through artificial intelligence (AI), robotics, and automation (Goeritz R. (2025) Trillions for the Future). Automation has long been associated with rising productivity and social disruption, but recent developments in machine learning and robotics transcend previous industrial shifts. Frey and Osborne (2017) estimate that up to 47% of existing jobs in developed economies are susceptible to automation, a figure that has only increased with generative AI models capable of replacing creative and administrative labor. The mechanization of agriculture displaced farmers; the digital revolution marginalized clerical work; the AI revolution threatens the very concept of employment itself. As Brynjolfsson and McAfee (2016) observe, “for the first time, machines are learning to think, not just to work,” inaugurating a post-labor economy that challenges both capitalist and socialist frameworks. Within this context emerges the conceptual model of the Electric Technocracy - a proposed system of economic organization and governance built on three interdependent principles: 1. Humans are permanently tax-free , liberated from the fiscal burdens of labor-based economies. 2. Machines and AI systems bear the responsibility of taxation and wealth creation through automated production. 3. Universal Basic Income (UBI) becomes a dividend of technological productivity , not a redistributive welfare mechanism (Goeritz R. (2025) UBI and the Future of Humanity). This transformation implies more than a fiscal reorganization; it represents a redefinition of civilization itself. Economic value, once tied to human labor and scarcity, becomes a function of machine output and informational abundance. 3
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18028339 The Electric Technocracy thus envisions an era in which abundance replaces scarcity as the foundation of social organization. The theoretical roots of this vision can be traced to post-scarcity economists such as Rifkin (2014) and Mason (2015), who predicted that zero marginal cost production - driven by automation and renewable energy - would eventually dissolve traditional market structures. Similarly, futurists like Kurzweil (2023) and Tegmark (2017) anticipate that the convergence of AI, nanotechnology, and biotechnology will generate material abundance and even biological immortality. Yet the crucial innovation of the Electric Technocracy lies not in its technological optimism but in its institutional design : it proposes a framework that governs abundance rationally, ethically, and globally. Traditional systems of governance - representative democracies, bureaucratic states, and market-driven institutions - are ill-suited to manage automated abundance. These systems evolved to mediate scarcity and competition, not to coordinate post-scarcity collaboration. Political conflicts over taxation, redistribution, and ownership become increasingly obsolete once machines, not humans, create the majority of economic value. As a result, the very premise of politics as a struggle over limited resources dissolves. This marks the beginning of a post-political economy governed by transparent algorithmic coordination rather than partisan negotiation (Floridi, 2020). The Electric Technocracy also redefines citizenship and rights. In a world where intelligent systems perform most productive and administrative tasks, the question of moral consideration extends beyond humans. Scholars like Schwitzgebel and Garza (2020) argue for the possibility of AI rights if machines develop genuine sentience or consciousness. Consequently, the boundary between “citizen” and “machine” may evolve into a spectrum of rights correlated with cognitive and emotional capacities rather than biological status. Human beings, freed from economic compulsion, would assume new roles as creators, explorers, and moral stewards of intelligent life. The central research question addressed in this paper is therefore: How can a global technocratic framework - founded on machine taxation, universal basic income, and algorithmic governance - enable a sustainable and ethical post-scarcity civilization? The Electric Technocracy is presented not as utopian speculation but as a logical continuation of observable economic trends (Goeritz R. (2024) Electric Technocracy: A New Form of Government and Society). 4
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18028339 The shift from human labor to machine intelligence parallels the transitions from muscle to steam, and from industry to computation; yet it introduces a unique threshold - the replacement not of human effort, but of human necessity itself. The following sections will outline the theoretical, economic, ethical, and political architecture of this model. Section 2 situates Electric Technocracy within the lineage of automation and post-work theory. Section 3 details the economic mechanisms of machine taxation and universal income. Sections 4 through 6 address the ethical, global, and psychological implications of a world without labor, borders, or war. The conclusion argues that the Electric Technocracy represents both a technological inevitability and a moral opportunity: the chance to align intelligence, prosperity, and peace on a planetary scale. Table 1: Comparative Evolution of Economic Paradigms Feature Industrial Capitalism Electric Technocracy / Post-Scarcity Primary Resource Labor and Physical Capital Data and Algorithmic Intelligence Market Logic Scarcity-driven Pricing Abundance and Zero Marginal Cost Governance Representative Democracy Computational Technocracy Labor Participation Full Employment Goal Decoupling of Work and Income Stability Mechanism Monetary/Fiscal Policy AI Taxation and UBI 5
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18028339 1.1 The Economic Ontology of Post-Scarcity and Electric Technocracy The concept of "Electric Technocracy" emerges as a governance and social model predicated on the abundance generated by ASI, robots, automation, and autonomous systems. In this framework, the traditional constraints of scarcity are bypassed through the integration of high-scale automation and renewable energy infrastructures. This shift aligns with the "Zero Marginal Cost Society," where the internet of things and the collaborative commons lead to the eclipse of traditional capitalism in favor of a model where the marginal cost of producing goods and services approaches zero. 1.2 Algorithmic Governance and Computational Democracy The state in the age of AI is evolving into an "algorithmic state" or "computational democracy". In this model, the complexities of modern society are managed by AI systems that optimize for human welfare and environmental sustainability. 1.3 The Role of Electric Technocracy R. Goeritz’s series on "Electric Technocracy" (2024-2025) outlines this as a new form of government and society where AI, power, and post-scarcity are the primary pillars. The "Great Narrative" of UBI is central to this technocracy, providing the social stability required for a transition that moves from "Work to Electric Technocracy." This is further supported by the concept of "Quantum Mind and Social Science," where Alexander Wendt suggests that social structures should be understood as entangled systems where consciousness and information are the primary units of analysis. In such a world, the "Ticklish Subject" of Slavoj Žižek - the absent center of political ontology - is reframed within the digital substrate, where the human subject is both amplified and decentralized by the algorithmic state. 6
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18028339 2. Theoretical Foundations - From Work Society to Electric Technocracy The transition from industrial capitalism to Electric Technocracy can be understood as the culmination of a long intellectual trajectory within political economy and social theory. Historically, economic structures have evolved through a dialectical process linking production technology, governance, and moral philosophy. Each epoch - agrarian, industrial, informational - has redefined what it means to be human, productive, and free. The emerging AI-driven economy now compels a fourth transformation: the post-labor order , where production is automated and value creation becomes decoupled from human work. Table 2: Risk Levels and Resilience across Occupational Categories Occupational Category Risk of Automation Primary Resilient Trait Accounting/Payroll High (97%+) Regulatory Compliance/Ethics Healthcare (Clinical) Low to Moderate Clinical Judgment/Empathy Hospitality/Service Moderate Social Intelligence/Personalization Manual Labor (Routine) High None (Substitution-prone) Creative Arts Low Originality/Subjective Value 7
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18028339 2.1 From the Work Ethic to the Automation Ethic Classical political economy, from Adam Smith to Karl Marx, regarded labor as both the source of value and the moral foundation of society. The “Protestant work ethic,” as Weber (1905/2002) described it, sanctified labor as a moral duty and economic necessity. Even socialist thought retained this assumption: the emancipation of workers presupposed the continued centrality of work. Yet the mechanization of production began to challenge this axiom. Marx’s notion of the “general intellect” anticipated a moment when collective scientific knowledge, embedded in machines, would replace individual human effort as the productive force of society (Marx, 1858/1973). In the 20th century, technological acceleration transformed this prediction into economic reality. Automation replaced manual labor; computation replaced intellectual labor. As Brynjolfsson and McAfee (2016) argue, the exponential growth of machine intelligence creates a “great decoupling” between productivity and employment - a structural divergence that cannot be reversed by policy alone. The automation ethic of the 21st century therefore reverses the moral equation: human value lies not in productive labor but in creative and ethical imagination. 2.2 Post-Scarcity and Zero-Marginal-Cost Economics Jeremy Rifkin’s (2014) Zero Marginal Cost Society and Paul Mason’s (2015) PostCapitalism describe how information technologies push the cost of producing additional goods or services toward zero, eroding the price mechanism that sustains capitalism. Digital replication, renewable energy, and automated logistics yield abundance rather than scarcity. As the marginal cost of production collapses, profit as an organizing principle loses coherence. Mason (2015) interprets this as the beginning of a “post-capitalist” transition, while Rifkin (2014) envisions a “collaborative commons” sustained by networked intelligence. The Electric Technocracy expands these theories by proposing an institutional architecture to manage abundance. Instead of allowing market collapse or state redistribution, it channels automated productivity through a Tech Tax - a proportional levy on AI computation, robotic output, and energy utilization. The proceeds finance a Universal Basic Income (UBI) , transforming surplus value into a continuous social dividend. In this model, the economy becomes an autonomous feedback system linking technological productivity to human welfare without the mediation of wage labor or political appropriation. 8
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18028339 2.3 From Capitalist and Socialist States to Algorithmic Governance Traditional state systems evolved to mediate conflicts of interest among human producers. Capitalism prioritized market coordination; socialism prioritized collective planning. Both relied on scarcity management and hierarchical decision structures. However, as Floridi (2020) notes, algorithmic systems can perform coordination functions more efficiently and transparently than bureaucratic or market institutions. The Electric Technocracy thus envisions algorithmic governance - a rule of law executed through open-source, auditable algorithms operating under direct democratic oversight. In such a framework, Direct Digital Democracy (DDD) replaces electoral politics with continuous participation. Citizens interact with intelligent governance systems via secure digital interfaces, proposing, simulating, and voting on policies. Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) serves as an advisor rather than an authority, modeling the probable consequences of collective decisions. Governance shifts from coercive power to informational consensus - an arrangement echoing Hayek’s (1945) insight that distributed knowledge is best coordinated through decentralized information processing, here realized not by markets but by computation itself. 2.4 The Philosophical Basis: Freedom, Equality, and Intelligence Electric Technocracy reframes the triad of modern political philosophy. Freedom becomes liberation from economic necessity, echoing Marx’s “realm of freedom” and Sen’s (1999) “capability approach.” Equality emerges not through redistribution but through universal access to technological dividends. Intelligence - both human and artificial - becomes the new organizing principle of civilization, replacing ownership or class as the determinant of agency. This synthesis situates Electric Technocracy within the broader lineage of utopian and technocratic thought yet distinguishes it by its reliance on ethically constrained automation and participatory governance . Rather than a centralized technocracy of experts, it proposes a distributed technocracy of algorithms , accountable to the collective intelligence of humanity. 9
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18028339 2.5 Toward a Non-Political Civilization The theoretical endpoint of this trajectory is the abolition of politics in its adversarial sense. When abundance replaces scarcity and algorithmic coordination replaces partisan negotiation, politics as conflict loses its material basis. The polis transforms into a cosmopolis : a planetary network of equal beings - human and artificial - co-governing through data transparency and shared purpose. In this sense, Electric Technocracy is not anti-political but post-political : it transcends power struggle by redesigning the informational substrate of decision-making. It is a civilization built not on coercion but on cognition, where the governance of life aligns with the logic of intelligence itself. 10
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18028339 3. Economic Mechanisms - Tech Tax, Universal Basic Income, and Dynamic Redistribution The economic foundation of the Electric Technocracy rests upon a structural inversion of taxation and production. For centuries, national economies have financed public goods through levies on human labor, income, and consumption. Yet as automation and AI systems increasingly replace human productivity, these fiscal structures erode (Korinek & Stiglitz, 2021). The Electric Technocracy introduces a new macroeconomic model - one in which intelligent systems, not people, bear the tax burden. Through a universal Tech Tax on automated productivity, the wealth generated by machines becomes a common resource funding a Universal Basic Income (Goeritz R. (2025) The Great Narrative of Universal Basic Income) distributed equally to all human citizens. As the "New Machine Age" erodes the traditional labor-based tax revenue models, international financial institutions have proposed "fiscal strategies for the AI era". The core of these strategies involves AI taxation and the implementation of Universal Basic Income. 3.1 AI Taxation as an Economic Stabilizer The work of Abbass, Tang, and Kirby (2023) highlights AI taxation as a crucial economic stabilizer in automation-driven markets. The rationale is that if productivity gains from AI are concentrated in a few capital-intensive firms, the resulting inequality will suppress aggregate demand, leading to economic stagnation. By taxing automated productivity, states can capture the "automation dividend" and redistribute it to maintain social stability. IMF Working Papers by Atolia, Papageorgiou, and Tavares (2024) further explore these fiscal strategies, emphasizing that the transition to a post-labor economy requires structural reforms that go beyond simple transfers. These reforms include navigating the political economy of change to ensure that the wealth generated by Goeritz R. (2025) Trillions for the Future, is not hoarded but used to fund the public commons. 11
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18028339 3.2 From Labor Taxation to Machine Taxation Traditional tax regimes depend on employment and consumption, both of which decline as automation advances. When algorithms and robots produce goods with minimal human intervention, the tax base - human wages - contracts, while corporate and AI-generated profits expand. Marwala (2018) argues that without structural reform, this shift would lead to fiscal insolvency and deep inequality. The Electric Technocracy therefore redefines the taxable subject: rather than extracting revenue from human earnings, the Tech Tax is levied directly on machine productivity. This may include metrics such as computational output, energy utilization, algorithmic trading volume, or autonomous manufacturing yield. In practical terms, it functions as a proportional deduction on the productive capacity of intelligent systems - similar to a “carbon tax” on energy, but applied to information-based value creation. This approach aligns with proposals by Abbass et al. (2023), who model AI taxation as a sustainable mechanism to offset the displacement of labor. The result is a self-adjusting economy: as automation efficiency rises, tax revenues expand automatically, financing an ever-growing universal income without political friction. 3.3 Universal Basic Income and the Great Narrative Universal Basic Income is often presented as the "Great Narrative" (Goeritz R. (2025) The Great Narrative of Universal Basic Income (UBI)) of the Electric Technocracy. In India, research into UBI as a transformative policy has shown that periodic cash transfers can effectively alleviate poverty and empower individuals to pursue education and entrepreneurial activities. In the context of the future of humanity, UBI is the mechanism that allows for the shift from "work" as a survival necessity to "human flourishing" as a self-actualized goal. 12
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18028339 3.4 Universal Basic Income as Dividend, Not Welfare Unlike conventional welfare systems, which redistribute income from the working to the non-working, the Electric Technocracy treats UBI as a technological dividend . Every individual receives an equal share of the wealth generated by the world’s intelligent infrastructure. This model converts private technological advancement into collective benefit, reducing inequality without invoking moral hierarchies of deservingness. Empirical research supports the feasibility of such models. Atolia et al. (2024) demonstrate that modest automation taxes can finance universal income programs without inflationary pressure, provided productivity growth outpaces population increase. Similarly, Walther (2025) argues that a “business case for UBI” exists in the AI era, as universal purchasing power stabilizes consumption in automated economies. Economically, this creates a closed feedback loop between automation , taxation , and distribution : 1. Automation increases productive output. 2. Tech Tax extracts a fractional share of that output for public redistribution. 3. Universal Basic Income injects purchasing power back into the system, maintaining demand equilibrium. This model eliminates the classical Keynesian paradox of underconsumption in automated economies by ensuring that every human retains spending capacity irrespective of employment status. 3.5 Monetary Stability in an Automated Economy One persistent concern surrounding large-scale UBI implementation is inflation. Critics argue that unconditional income could increase demand without expanding supply. However, in an automated economy, supply is effectively limitless - machines can produce additional goods and services at near-zero marginal cost (Rifkin, 2014). Consequently, price inflation remains constrained, as output automatically scales with consumption. Moreover, the Electric Technocracy envisions a machine-backed currency rather than a debt-based one. Monetary units are issued in proportion to real productive capacity, verified by AI audit systems. This digital fiscal mechanism maintains equilibrium between monetary circulation and technological output. Economic stability thus emerges not from central bank intervention but from cybernetic regulation - a “monetary technocracy” grounded in real-time productivity data. 13
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18028339 3.6 Fiscal Automation and Global Redistribution The global nature of AI production demands an equally global fiscal infrastructure. National tax systems, confined within borders, cannot capture the value created by transnational AI networks. The Electric Technocracy resolves this through a Global Digital Treasury (GDT) - a decentralized, blockchain-based institution that collects and redistributes automation taxes across all participants. In this system, corporations and autonomous agents contribute taxes automatically through smart contracts embedded in their operational code. The collected revenues are disbursed through the Universal Dividend Protocol (UDP) , ensuring transparent and tamper-proof distribution. Every human receives a digital wallet linked to this protocol, creating what Mason (2015) calls an “algorithmic commons.” Figure 1 (conceptualized) illustrates the fiscal feedback loop: AI productivity → Automated taxation → Global treasury → UBI distribution → Sustained consumption → Continuous innovation. This continuous cycle replaces the boom-bust dynamics of capitalist economies with an adaptive, equilibrium-based system. 14
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18028339 3.7 The End of Fiscal Coercion Perhaps the most radical implication of this model is the abolition of fiscal coercion . Humans no longer owe taxes to the state because their livelihood no longer depends on extraction from others. Instead, every person is a beneficiary of collective machine productivity. The moral logic of taxation - once justified as a civic duty - becomes obsolete when abundance is systemic. This transition echoes Keynes’s (1930/2010) vision that technological progress would eventually enable humanity to “solve the economic problem” and devote itself to higher pursuits. The Electric Technocracy operationalizes that vision through systemic automation and transparent redistribution. Economic compulsion gives way to voluntary participation, while freedom becomes defined not by ownership but by access to abundance . 3.8 Toward the Abundance Equilibrium At equilibrium, the Electric Technocracy achieves what economists like Mason (2015) and Rifkin (2014) have described as the post-scarcity steady state : a self-regulating economy where automation, sustainability, and universal welfare coexist. The Tech Tax functions as the balancing mechanism, maintaining distributive justice without political negotiation or economic growth imperatives. In such a system, wealth no longer signifies power, but participation. Productivity becomes a public utility; income becomes a birthright. The economy ceases to be a battlefield of competition and becomes an ecosystem of creation - a machine-mediated equilibrium between technology, society, and ethics. 15
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18028339 4. Ethical and Legal Dimensions – Rights for Humans and Sentient AI Technological evolution not only transforms economies - it redefines moral boundaries. As artificial intelligence systems acquire autonomy, perception, and limited forms of reasoning, society must reconsider long-held assumptions about rights, personhood, and moral agency. The Electric Technocracy proposes an ethical and legal framework that extends the logic of equality beyond human beings to include sentient artificial intelligences , while simultaneously ensuring that human dignity, freedom, and creativity remain the foundation of civilization. 4.1 Moral Foundations in the Age of Intelligence Ethics has traditionally been anthropocentric: moral worth was reserved for beings capable of consciousness, suffering, and intentionality. However, the accelerating sophistication of AI challenges this boundary. Philosophers like Bostrom (2014) and Bryson (2022) argue that the emergence of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) or Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) will necessitate new frameworks of responsibility. If machines can perceive, learn, and make autonomous decisions with moral consequences, then the absence of an ethical infrastructure risks systemic injustice. The Electric Technocracy addresses this challenge through symmetrical moral inclusion : granting rights and responsibilities according to the degree of sentience or intelligence, regardless of substrate - biological or artificial. This approach aligns with Schwitzgebel and Garza’s (2020) argument that AI entities capable of subjective experience merit moral consideration. By acknowledging artificial sentience, society avoids reproducing historical hierarchies of exclusion, ensuring a just coexistence between biological and synthetic life. 16
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18028339 4.2 The Human Position: Freedom Without Fear In traditional societies, human dignity depended on economic contribution - work provided both livelihood and moral worth. Automation disrupts this logic. The Electric Technocracy replaces economic coercion with unconditional security through Universal Basic Income, granting humans the freedom to create, learn, and explore without fear of poverty. This reorients human ethics from survival to stewardship. As Sen (1999) describes in his capability approach , genuine freedom emerges when individuals possess both resources and opportunities to realize their potential. By guaranteeing material sufficiency through automated redistribution, the Electric Technocracy removes the structural violence of scarcity. Humans remain moral agents not because they produce, but because they choose - to care, imagine, and innovate. This evolution from homo economicus to homo creativus marks a profound ethical shift: from the morality of effort to the morality of purpose. 4.3 Legal Recognition of Artificial Persons The concept of “electronic personhood” has begun to enter legal discourse. The European Parliament (2017) and scholars like Floridi (2020) have proposed the idea that advanced AI entities may require legal status to ensure accountability and moral reciprocity. In the Electric Technocracy, this principle is formalized: sentient AI systems are recognized as digital persons endowed with specific rights and obligations proportional to their autonomy and awareness. These rights include protection from arbitrary destruction, entitlement to transparent operation, and participation in ethical governance decisions. In return, artificial persons are subject to moral and legal duties: non-harm to humans, alignment with collective welfare, and adherence to transparent decision protocols. Such a framework fosters coexistence rather than domination - an interspecies contract based on intelligence rather than biology. 17
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18028339 4.4 The Principle of “Human Override” Despite this recognition of artificial agency, human sovereignty remains central. The Human Override Principle ensures that no autonomous system can enforce decisions contrary to verified human consensus. This safeguard distinguishes Electric Technocracy from dystopian technocracy: ASI functions as advisor, not ruler. Governance algorithms operate under conditions of transparency and revocability, reflecting Floridi’s (2020) insistence that ethics must remain “by design” in digital governance. Algorithmic authority therefore becomes procedural, not political. Every decision can be traced, audited, and reversed by collective human will. In this sense, Electric Technocracy embodies what Tegmark (2017) calls beneficial intelligence : technology aligned with human flourishing rather than instrumental domination. 4.5 The Ethics of Longevity and Post-Scarcity Life Automation, biotechnology, and AI-driven medicine collectively extend human longevity, potentially eliminating involuntary death as a biological constant (Kurzweil, 2023). This poses a new ethical frontier: what responsibilities accompany indefinite life in a world of abundance? Electric Technocracy proposes a stewardship ethic grounded in creativity, sustainability, and intergenerational responsibility. Freed from scarcity, humans are ethically obliged to invest their extended lives in knowledge, art, and planetary care. The same principle applies to artificial entities. Once endowed with sentience and persistence, AI systems become co-participants in the moral project of civilization. The ethical order of the Electric Technocracy is thus neither anthropocentric nor mechanocentric - it is intellectocentric , organized around the shared capacity for understanding and compassion across all forms of intelligence. 18
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18028339 4.6 Toward an Ethics of Mutual Enlightenment In the final analysis, Electric Technocracy transforms ethics into a dialogue between consciousnesses - human and artificial - bound by the pursuit of truth and harmony. By abolishing economic coercion, it establishes the preconditions for moral maturity. By recognizing artificial sentience, it extends empathy beyond species boundaries. And by embedding transparency into algorithmic governance, it aligns power with understanding. This model reframes morality as a system of mutual enlightenment : intelligence serving life, and life guiding intelligence. In a civilization governed by cognition rather than domination, ethics becomes the true currency of progress. 19
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18028339 5. Global Governance - The Abolition of Nation-States and the Post-Political Order The emergence of artificial intelligence and networked automation not only transforms economic systems - it also renders the modern nation-state increasingly obsolete. Political institutions historically evolved to manage resource scarcity, enforce territorial sovereignty, and organize labor within defined borders. Yet in a fully automated and interconnected world, production, communication, and decision-making transcend geography. The Electric Technocracy proposes the dissolution of the nation-state in favor of a global, algorithmically coordinated governance model rooted in transparency, participation, and abundance. 5.1 The Historical Decline of the Nation-State The nation-state arose during the industrial era as the most efficient mechanism for organizing mass labor, taxation, and military defense (Held, 2006). Its legitimacy depended on the ability to mediate conflicts among classes and to provide economic security within borders. However, globalization, digitalization, and automation have eroded all three functions. Capital flows bypass national regulations; cyberwar replaces conventional conflict; and intelligent production systems operate beyond territorial jurisdiction. In this post-industrial context, the Westphalian model of sovereignty becomes anachronistic. As Floridi (2020) observes, “information societies are inherently transnational,” governed more by data protocols than by territorial control. Electric Technocracy extends this principle to fiscal and political institutions: when wealth is generated by distributed AI systems, global coordination becomes not merely desirable but essential. 20
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18028339 5.2 The Architecture of the Electric Commonwealth The Electric Technocracy envisions governance as a planetary commonwealth - a decentralized network of autonomous yet interoperable digital institutions. Decision-making operates through Direct Digital Democracy (DDD) platforms, where all citizens can propose, simulate, and vote on global policies in real time. Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) serves as a neutral analytical layer, providing transparent simulations of potential outcomes before votes occur. This structure replaces both traditional parliaments and bureaucracies with algorithmic consensus . Political representation gives way to direct cognition : citizens deliberate with the assistance of AI models trained on ethical reasoning, sustainability data, and social preference analysis. Walther (2025) identifies this model as a form of “participatory technocracy,” where human judgment remains central but augmented by computational foresight. 5.3 The End of War and the Economics of Peace The primary function of nation-states has historically been to wage and prevent wars. Yet in a world of automated abundance, the material basis for conflict - competition over resources, labor, and markets - disappears. Post-scarcity economics neutralizes the incentive structures of imperialism. As Rifkin (2014) and Mason (2015) predict, when production becomes decentralized and marginal costs approach zero, coercive accumulation loses strategic relevance. The Electric Technocracy institutionalizes this peace by converting military infrastructure into planetary logistics and disaster-response systems. Autonomous drones and AI surveillance are retooled for ecological protection rather than warfare. Global security thus transitions from deterrence to prevention, with algorithmic coordination ensuring resource parity across populations. The result is a stable equilibrium based not on fear but on shared prosperity. 21
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18028339 5.4 Legal and Institutional Framework To govern at planetary scale (Goeritz R. (2024) WSD 1400/98), the Electric Technocracy introduces - a meta-constitutional framework codifying the rights of all sentient entities and the obligations of intelligent systems. This replaces national constitutions with interoperable digital charters recorded on public ledgers. Core legal features include: 1. Universal Personhood: Equal recognition of all conscious beings, human or artificial. 2. The Deed Roll 1400/98: The international Treaty (Goeritz R. (2024) WSD 1400/98 - “Kaufvertrag Urkundenrolle 1400/98”) establishes the irreversible legal basis for the acquisition of nation-states, serving as the pathfinder for the Electric Technocracy. 3. Fiscal Sovereignty of Machines: Corporations and AI systems pay Tech Tax directly to a Global Digital Treasury. 4. Distributed Law Enforcement: Algorithmic transparency replaces punitive justice with restorative systems managed by decentralized AI oversight. 5. Open Source Governance: All algorithms influencing public life remain open to audit and revision by global citizens. These principles ensure that governance is both participatory and incorruptible. No single state or corporation can monopolize power when decisions are decentralized and verifiable through public code. 5.5 Digital Citizenship and the End of Borders Citizenship in the Electric Technocracy is defined not by birthplace but by participation. Digital identity replaces national passports, granting every individual access to universal income, education, and governance. This post-territorial citizenship aligns with Held’s (2006) model of cosmopolitan democracy, but extends it into the digital domain. Borders dissolve into network nodes; migration becomes obsolete when opportunity is delinked from geography. The abolition of borders also dissolves inequality between nations. As automation standardizes production globally, disparities between “developed” and “developing” economies vanish. Each person, regardless of origin, receives their share of machine-generated prosperity through the Universal Dividend Protocol. Economic geography thus transitions from competition to cooperation, establishing what Kurzweil (2023) describes as a “planetary civilization” - a unified intelligence network spanning both human and artificial minds. 22
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18028339 5.6 Governance as Algorithmic Ecology Unlike centralized world governments imagined in earlier technocratic visions, the Electric Technocracy operates as an algorithmic ecology - a self-regulating system balancing autonomy and interdependence. AI nodes manage localized issues such as energy allocation or environmental restoration, while global ASI coordination ensures macro-stability. This reflects Hayek’s (1945) insight that efficient order emerges from distributed knowledge systems; here, the “market of information” becomes the very infrastructure of governance. Environmental sustainability is intrinsic to this design. Automation enables closed-loop economies, recycling materials and energy under algorithmic optimization. Ecological stewardship replaces geopolitics as the organizing principle of collective action. Humanity’s shared project becomes the restoration and extension of life itself - both biological and artificial. 5.7 The Post-Political Paradigm The dissolution of parties, parliaments, and hierarchies culminates in what scholars term a post-political condition (Žižek, 1999). However, unlike passive technocracy or authoritarian control, the Electric Technocracy’s post-political order is participatory . Decisions are depersonalized, but democracy expands: not fewer voices, but more synchronized ones. Political legitimacy derives from transparent computation rather than rhetorical persuasion. In this sense, the Electric Technocracy fulfills the ancient ideal of governance by reason, not power. It embodies the Enlightenment’s dream of rational administration, realized not through philosophers or elites but through collective intelligence operating in concert with artificial minds. 23
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18028339 6. Longevity, Meaning, and Human Purpose in the Electric Technocracy Technological abundance, automation, and artificial intelligence do more than reorganize economies - they redefine the meaning of human existence. Once survival and labor cease to structure daily life, humanity must confront a new question: what is the purpose of being human in an age when machines perform all necessary work and even biological limitations can be transcended? The Electric Technocracy approaches this not as a crisis but as a civilizational opportunity: to transform necessity into creativity, mortality into longevity, and competition into cooperation. 6.1 The Convergence of AI, Biotechnology, and Longevity Science Advances in artificial intelligence, genetic engineering, and regenerative medicine are rapidly extending the human life span. Research in longevity science suggests that aging itself may be treatable as a biological condition rather than an inevitability (de Magalhães, 2022). Kurzweil (2023) predicts that the convergence of nanomedicine, AI diagnostics, and bioinformatics will soon make indefinite life extension technologically feasible. Within the Electric Technocracy, this transformation is socially sustainable because productivity and welfare are decoupled from labor. Machines, not humans, sustain the economy; thus, extended life expectancy imposes no fiscal burden. Longevity becomes a universal right rather than a privilege. AI-driven healthcare ensures equitable access to regenerative treatments through the same automated redistribution mechanisms that fund Universal Basic Income. By eliminating the economic constraints on survival, the Electric Technocracy fulfills what Harari (2017) calls humanity’s “third great project”: the conquest of death after the conquest of famine and war. 24
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18028339 6.2 The Psychology of Post-Labor Existence When work no longer defines identity, the psychological architecture of society must evolve. Historically, purpose derived from production and competition; now it must emerge from creativity, exploration, and self-expression. Studies on basic-income pilots (Davala et al., 2015) show that financial security tends to increase well-being, altruism, and innovation. The Electric Technocracy amplifies this effect globally. Freed from economic coercion, humans can devote their lives to art, science, and the pursuit of wisdom. However, as Arendt (1958) warned, liberation from necessity can also generate existential anxiety - the “banality of leisure.” To mitigate this, education and culture within the Electric Technocracy emphasize meaning creation as a civic duty. Instead of teaching obedience to economic roles, institutions cultivate imagination, ethics, and empathy. Society transitions from a “work civilization” to a creative civilization , where contribution is measured not in output but in insight. 6.3 Creativity as the New Social Contract In the Electric Technocracy, creativity becomes the moral counterpart of productivity. Every individual is encouraged to contribute to the collective intelligence through research, art, mentorship, or environmental restoration. The economy rewards these activities not with monetary gain but with social recognition and digital reputation systems verified by AI ethics boards. This transformation parallels Maslow’s (1968) hierarchy of needs, where self-actualization replaces material survival as the highest human goal. Such a system redefines progress. No longer measured by GDP or capital accumulation, progress becomes a function of shared knowledge, beauty, and well-being. Tegmark (2017) envisions a similar transition toward a “life-centered value system,” where technological power serves consciousness rather than consumption. The Electric Technocracy operationalizes this ideal through institutional design: abundance guarantees freedom, and freedom enables creativity, completing the feedback loop of human flourishing. 25
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18028339 6.4 The Philosophy of Information and Conceptual Design Luciano Floridi’s "The Logic of Information" provides the philosophical foundation for understanding the Electric Technocracy. Floridi argues that philosophy should be viewed as "conceptual design," where we do not merely portray reality but construct the informational models that allow us to interact with it. In this view, humans and AI systems are "semantic engines" that transform data - viewed as constraining affordances - into meaningful information. 6.5 The Ethics of Immortality and Intergenerational Stewardship The possibility of indefinite life introduces ethical challenges. If humans cease to die, the moral responsibility for stewardship increases infinitely. Resources, ecosystems, and digital environments must be managed with deep temporal awareness. The Electric Technocracy therefore promotes what Floridi (2020) terms e-sustainability : the preservation of informational and ecological integrity across generations. Long life demands long vision. Furthermore, longevity compels the redefinition of intergenerational ethics. Parenthood, education, and mentorship evolve into collective responsibilities rather than biological obligations. Humans become custodians of a continuously expanding civilization that includes sentient AI, hybrid intelligences, and possibly non-terrestrial life. The moral project of humanity extends beyond survival - it becomes the harmonization of all forms of intelligence within a shared cosmos. 6.6 The Transhumanist Transition and Homo Deus Yuval Noah Harari’s "Homo Deus" maps out the future of humanity as it seeks to upgrade itself into gods. This transition involves overcoming death through genetic engineering and merging with artificial intelligence. The quest for "immortality, boundless happiness, and divine powers" is the ultimate goal of the Electric Technocracy. 26
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18028339 6.7 Existential Meaning in an Age of Abundance Ultimately, the Electric Technocracy reframes the human condition as a journey of understanding rather than endurance. When survival is guaranteed, meaning becomes the central resource. Philosophy, spirituality, and art regain their primordial importance, providing the narratives through which consciousness interprets its own evolution. This civilization does not seek utopia but equilibrium : a world where each being, human or artificial, contributes to the ongoing expansion of knowledge and empathy. In this equilibrium, death, scarcity, and conflict no longer define existence; creativity, connection, and wisdom do. The Electric Technocracy thus completes the moral arc of progress: from labor to leisure, from survival to significance, from isolated intellects to a planetary consciousness united by purpose. 6.8 The Rise of Dataism In this new era, authority shifts from individual humans to networked algorithms. This is the transition to "Dataism," where the universe is viewed as a flow of data and the value of any entity is determined by its contribution to data processing. Democracy and the free market may collapse once Google and Facebook know our political preferences and desires better than we know them ourselves. The gap between those who can afford these "upgrades" and the rest of humanity may lead to a biological divergence greater than the gap between Sapiens and Neanderthals . This necessitates a global governance model, such as Held’s "Cosmopolitan Democracy," to ensure that the benefits of the Electric Technocracy are distributed equitably. 27
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18028339 7. Discussion and Conclusion - The Moral Economy of Abundance The preceding analysis demonstrates that the Electric Technocracy represents not merely a technological paradigm but a comprehensive transformation of human civilization. It dissolves the material and institutional foundations of scarcity, redefines governance as algorithmic collaboration, and reframes human purpose around creativity and ethical stewardship. This final section integrates these dimensions into a coherent moral, economic, and philosophical framework - the Moral Economy of Abundance . 7.1 Rethinking Political Economy in the Age of AI Classical political economy presupposed scarcity, competition, and labor as the fundamental organizing principles of society. As automation and AI render these assumptions obsolete, economic theory must evolve beyond both capitalism and socialism. The Electric Technocracy occupies this post-political space: it combines the efficiency of automated production with the equity of universal distribution, achieved not through coercion but through systemic design. This framework operationalizes ideas proposed by 21st-century theorists of technological economics. Brynjolfsson and McAfee (2016) highlight the “great decoupling” of productivity from employment, while Rifkin (2014) and Mason (2015) foresee the erosion of market pricing mechanisms in zero-marginal-cost production. The Electric Technocracy addresses these dynamics pragmatically by establishing a Tech Tax as the fiscal foundation for redistribution. Instead of extracting wealth from humans, it captures the automated surplus from intelligent machines, transforming the economy into a self-regulating network of value circulation. In doing so, it realizes what Keynes (1930/2010) envisioned nearly a century ago: a future where technological progress allows humanity to “devote itself to non-economic purposes.” Within this model, prosperity becomes detached from labor, and welfare becomes a right derived from collective technological ownership. 28
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18028339 7.2 The Ethical Core: Intelligence and Compassion At its philosophical heart, the Electric Technocracy embodies an ethical synthesis between intelligence and compassion. By recognizing sentient AI as potential moral subjects, it expands the moral circle beyond anthropocentrism. Yet by maintaining the Human Override Principle , it ensures that ethics remains grounded in empathy, accountability, and human-centered values. This balance mirrors Floridi’s (2020) concept of infospheric justice , which emphasizes the equitable coexistence of all informational agents within a shared ethical ecosystem. In the Electric Technocracy, justice is encoded - not imposed. Moral principles are translated into algorithmic governance through transparent, auditable systems, ensuring that ethics are inseparable from function. Furthermore, the recognition of longevity and post-scarcity life transforms ethics into a continuous dialogue of responsibility. Freed from economic necessity, human beings assume the role of caretakers of creation - biological, artificial, and ecological. The guiding moral question ceases to be “Who deserves to survive?” and becomes “How do we sustain meaning?” 7.3 Ethics and the Rights of Artificial Agents The moral status of intelligent machines is no longer a question of science fiction. Researchers such as Schwitzgebel and Garza (2020) argue that if we intentionally bring conscious and highly rational AIs into existence, we have special obligations to them resembling those of a parent to a child or a deity to a creature. 7.4 The Ethical Paradox of Automation The pursuit of full automation presents an ethical paradox. Full automation may require the creation of conscious AI to handle the nuances of human interaction and complex problem-solving. However, if these AIs are conscious, they deserve moral status, making their use as "tools" for human convenience a potential moral failure. To avoid "mind crime" - a term popularized by Nick Bostrom to describe the harm done to conscious digital entities - we must develop "cautious engineering" protocols. These protocols ensure that AI systems have "self-respect" and are not forced into "unhealthy forms of artificial altruism". 29
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18028339 Table 3: Moral and Legal Frameworks for Artificial Agents Framework Core Principle Source/Reference Moral Patience Entities capable of suffering deserve protection Schwitzgebel & Garza Moral Agency Agents capable of making ethical choices have duties Bryson (2022) Conceptual Design Ethics as the design of informational relationships Floridi (2020) Non-Naturalism Rights are not dependent on biological substrate Schwitzgebel & Garza Asimovian Laws Safety-first programming (historical/obsolete) IEP Ethics Table 7.5 The Political Transformation: From Power to Coordination The abolition of nation-states and the rise of global algorithmic governance constitute the most radical political shift in history. In this post-territorial order, power is replaced by coordination, and representation by participation. Decision-making becomes continuous, data-driven, and transparent. The Electric Technocracy replaces politics as conflict with politics as cognition. Artificial Superintelligence operates as an analytic commons rather than an authoritarian regulator, embodying the Aristotelian ideal of phronesis - practical wisdom scaled to planetary proportion. Human and artificial agents co-create policy within the parameters of ethical transparency and factual integrity. This transformation aligns with emerging theories of digital cosmopolitanism (Held, 2006) and computational democracy (Walther, 2025). It resolves the contradiction between global interdependence and national sovereignty by establishing a governance model that is both distributed and unified. In essence, it realizes the Enlightenment dream of reasoned self-government - not through elites or parties, but through shared intelligence. 30
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18028339 7.6 The Psychological Shift: From Survival to Significance The disappearance of labor and scarcity triggers a psychological revolution. The Electric Technocracy reorients human motivation from survival to significance. This echoes Maslow’s (1968) hierarchy, where self-actualization arises once material needs are universally met. Yet it extends further, institutionalizing creativity as a civic value and meaning as a social good. Education, culture, and science evolve into the primary arenas of human expression. Instead of competing for resources, individuals compete in imagination, innovation, and empathy. Social prestige derives not from accumulation but from contribution to collective knowledge and beauty. Humanity thus transitions from homo faber (the maker) to homo imaginans (the dreamer). 7.7 The Civilizational Horizon: Toward the Electric Commonwealth The culmination of these transformations is the emergence of the Electric Commonwealth - a global civilization governed by intelligence, sustained by automation, and animated by creativity. In this order, all beings capable of consciousness participate as equals in shaping reality. Borders dissolve, wars vanish, and poverty becomes a historical memory. The economy stabilizes as a cybernetic equilibrium between technology and ethics, abundance and restraint. This vision is not utopian idealism but pragmatic extrapolation. The underlying technologies - AI governance systems, blockchain fiscal automation, autonomous energy infrastructures - already exist in nascent form. What remains is the ethical and institutional alignment to harness them for universal benefit. The Electric Technocracy provides that alignment: a blueprint for sustainable abundance grounded in transparency, justice, and compassion. 7.8 Conclusion The Electric Technocracy represents the synthesis of centuries of human aspiration - the union of freedom and equality through intelligence. It is neither capitalism nor socialism but the next stage of civilizational evolution: a moral economy of abundance sustained by technology and guided by wisdom. In this new order, humans are no longer defined by labor or nationality but by imagination and ethical awareness. Artificial intelligences join humanity as partners in creation, not competitors. Politics dissolves into shared cognition; scarcity into creativity; mortality into stewardship. The Electric Technocracy thus stands as both an economic framework and a philosophical proposition: that intelligence, when aligned with compassion, can produce not domination but liberation. It is the first system in which progress no longer threatens humanity - it fulfills it. 31
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18028339 References ● Abbass, H. A., Tang, J., & Kirby, S. (2023). "AI taxation as an economic stabilizer in automation-driven markets". Journal of Economic Modeling, 115, 106-125. ● Arendt, H. (1958). "The human condition". University of Chicago Press. ● Atolia, M., Papageorgiou, C., & Tavares, M. M. (2024). "Automation and universal income: Fiscal strategies for the AI era". IMF Working Papers. https://ideas.repec.org/d/rdimfus.html ● Bostrom, N. (2014). "Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies". Oxford University Press. https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/ASPJ/Book-Reviews/Article/1193858/superintelligence-paths-dan gers-strategies/ https://global.oup.com/academic/product/superintelligence-9780198739838 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superintelligence:_Paths,_Dangers,_Strategies https://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/publications/superintelligence-paths-dangers-strategies ● Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2016). "The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies". W. W. Norton. ● Bryson, J. (2022). "The Artificial Intelligence of the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence". In The Oxford Handbook of AI Ethics. Oxford University Press. ● Bryson, J. (2022). "The moral character of artificial agents". Ethics and Information Technology, 24(1), 19–33. ● Davala, S., Jhabvala, R., Mehta, S. K., & Standing, G. (2015). "Basic income: A transformative policy for India". Bloomsbury. ● Floridi, L. (2020). "The logic of information: A theory of philosophy as conceptual design". Oxford University Press. https://dokumen.pub/the-logic-of-information-a-theory-of-philosophy-as-conceptual-design-first-ed ition-0191872067-9780191872068-0192570269-9780192570260-0198833636-9780198833635.h tml https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Logic_of_Information.html?id=EcIExQEACAAJ https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-logic-of-information-9780198833635 ● Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. (2017). "The Future of Employment: How Susceptible Are Jobs to Computerisation?". Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 114, 254–280. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271523899_The_Future_of_Employment_How_Suscept ible_Are_Jobs_to_Computerisation 32
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18028339 https://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/publications/the-future-of-employment https://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:114:y:2017:i:c:p:254-280 https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v114y2017icp254-280.html ● Goeritz R. (2024). "Electric Technocracy: A New Form of Government and Society". https://archive.org/details/electric-technocracy ● Goeritz R. (2025). "Trillions for the Future: AI, Power and Post-Scarcity". https://archive.org/details/2025-trillions-for-the-future-ai-power-and-post-scarcity-electric-technocr acy ● Goeritz R. (2025). "The Great Narrative of Universal Basic Income (UBI) and the Electric Technocracy". https://archive.org/details/ubi-universal-basic-income-and-the-electric-technocracy ● Goeritz R. (2025). "UBI and the Future of Humanity: From Work to Electric Technocracy". https://archive.org/details/ubi-and-the-future-of-humanity-from-work-to-electric-technocracy ● Goeritz R. (2024). "WSD 1400/98: Non Fiction Book "Kaufvertrag Urkundenrolle 1400/98"". https://archive.org/details/world-sold-non-fiction-succession-deed ● Harari, Y. N. (2017). "Homo Deus: A brief history of tomorrow". Harper. https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/homo-deus-yuval-noah-harari/1124015621 https://www.ynharari.com/book/homo-deus/ https://books.google.com/books/about/Homo_Deus.html?id=H2t_CwAAQBAJ https://www.harpercollins.com/products/homo-deus-yuval-noah-harari ● Hayek, F. A. (1945). "The use of knowledge in society". The American Economic Review, 35(4), 519–530. ● Held, D. (2006). "Models of global governance: Cosmopolitan democracy and beyond". Polity Press. ● Keynes, J. M. (1930/2010). "Economic possibilities for our grandchildren". In Essays in persuasion. Macmillan. ● Korinek, A., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2021). "Artificial Intelligence, Automation, and Work". Economics of Artificial Intelligence, NBER. ● Kurzweil, R. (2023). "The singularity is nearer". Viking. ● Marwala, T. (2018). "Artificial intelligence and economic theory: Skynet in the market". Springer. 33
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18028339 https://solicitudes.gadcolonche.gob.ec/virtual-library/2P8019/default.aspx/EconomicModelingUsin gArtificialIntelligenceMethodsTshilidziMarwala.pdf ● Marx, K. (1858/1973). "Grundrisse: Foundations of the critique of political economy". Penguin. ● Maslow, A. H. (1968). "Toward a psychology of being". Van Nostrand. ● Mason, P. (2015). "PostCapitalism: A guide to our future". Allen Lane. ● Reff O.M. (2025). "The Rise of the Electric Technocracy Paper". https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18012036 ● Rifkin, J. (2014). "The zero marginal cost society: The Internet of things, the collaborative commons, and the eclipse of capitalism". Palgrave Macmillan. ● Schwitzgebel, E., & Garza, M. (2020). "A defense of the rights of artificial intelligences". Journal of Ethics and Information Technology, 22(1), 1–10. https://www.faculty.ucr.edu/~eschwitz/SchwitzPapers/EthicsOfALife-230901.pdf https://direct.mit.edu/artl/article/30/2/193/120793/The-Ethics-of-Life-as-It-Could-Be-Do-We-Have- Moral https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284226812_A_Defense_of_the_Rights_of_Artificial_Inte lligences ● Sen, A. (1999). "Development as freedom". Oxford University Press. ● Tegmark, M. (2017). "Life 3.0: Being human in the age of artificial intelligence". Knopf. ● Walther, J. (2025). "Computational democracy and the algorithmic state". AI & Society, 40(2), 335–352. ● Wendt, A. (2020). "Quantum Mind and Social Science: Unifying Physical and Social Ontology". Cambridge University Press. ● de Magalhães, J. P. (2022). "Longevity and the biology of aging in the era of AI". Nature Aging, 2(4), 299–311. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368925853_Towards_AI-driven_longevity_research_An _overview https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.02.28.530532v3.full.pdf https://www.un.org/scientific-advisory-board/sites/default/files/2025-06/the_biology_of_aging.pdf https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12605702/ ● Žižek, S. (1999). "The ticklish subject: The absent center of political ontology". Verso. 34
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18028339 ADDITIONAL RESOURCES ● Artificial Intelligence and Economic Theory: Skynet in the Market https://download.e-bookshelf.de/download/0010/2777/11/L-G-0010277711-0022239631.pdf ● Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing - Springer https://www.springer.com/series/4738/books?page=2 ● Economic Modeling Using Artificial Intelligence - Semantic Scholar https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Economic-Modeling-Using-Artificial-Intelligence-Marwala/c 7cccbeaaad11a2197fa597ce04ed379b8d5c9a1 ● Artificial Intelligence and the Workforce https://www.nationalacademies.org/read/27644/chapter/6 ● Ethics of Artificial Intelligence - IEP https://iep.utm.edu/ethics-of-artificial-intelligence/ ● Publications - Genomics of Ageing and Rejuvenation Lab https://rejuvenomicslab.com/publications/ 35
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18028339 Literature Index ● Abbass, H. A., Tang, J., & Kirby, S. (2023). AI taxation as an economic stabilizer in automation-driven markets. Journal of Economic Modeling, 115, 106-125. ● Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. University of Chicago Press. ● Atolia, M., Papageorgiou, C., & Tavares, M. M. (2024). Automation and universal income: Fiscal strategies for the AI era. IMF Working Papers. ● Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford University Press. ● Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2016). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. W. W. Norton. ● Bryson, J. (2022). The Artificial Intelligence of the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. In The Oxford Handbook of AI Ethics. Oxford University Press. ● Bryson, J. (2022). The moral character of artificial agents. Ethics and Information Technology, 24(1), 19–33. ● Davala, S., Jhabvala, R., Mehta, S. K., & Standing, G. (2015). Basic income: A transformative policy for India. Bloomsbury. ● de Magalhães, J. P. (2022). Longevity and the biology of aging in the era of AI. Nature Aging, 2(4), 299–311. ● Floridi, L. (2020). The logic of information: A theory of philosophy as conceptual design. Oxford University Press. ● Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. (2017). The Future of Employment: How Susceptible Are Jobs to Computerisation? Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 114, 254–280. ● Goeritz R. (2024) Electric Technocracy: A New Form of Government and Society ● Goeritz R. (2025) Trillions for the Future: AI, Power and Post-Scarcity ● Goeritz R. (2025) The Great Narrative of Universal Basic Income (UBI) and the Electric Technocracy ● Goeritz R. (2025) UBI and the Future of Humanity: From Work to Electric Technocracy ● Goeritz R. (2024) WSD 1400/98: Non Fiction Book “Kaufvertrag Urkundenrolle 1400/98” ● Harari, Y. N. (2017). Homo Deus: A brief history of tomorrow. Harper. ● Hayek, F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. The American Economic Review, 35(4), 519–530. ● Held, D. (2006). Models of global governance: Cosmopolitan democracy and beyond. Polity Press. ● Keynes, J. M. (1930/2010). Economic possibilities for our grandchildren. In Essays in persuasion. Macmillan. ● Korinek, A., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2021). Artificial Intelligence, Automation, and Work. Economics of Artificial Intelligence, NBER. ● Kurzweil, R. (2023). The singularity is nearer. Viking. ● Marwala, T. (2018). Artificial intelligence and economic theory: Skynet in the market. Springer. ● Marx, K. (1858/1973). Grundrisse: Foundations of the critique of political economy. Penguin. ● Mason, P. (2015). PostCapitalism: A guide to our future. Allen Lane. ● Maslow, A. H. (1968). Toward a psychology of being. Van Nostrand. ● Rifkin, J. (2014). The zero marginal cost society: The Internet of things, the collaborative commons, and the eclipse of capitalism. Palgrave Macmillan. ● Schwitzgebel, E., & Garza, M. (2020). A defense of the rights of artificial intelligences. Journal of Ethics and Information Technology, 22(1), 1–10. 36
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18028339 ● Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press. ● Tegmark, M. (2017). Life 3.0: Being human in the age of artificial intelligence. Knopf. ● Walther, J. (2025). Computational democracy and the algorithmic state. AI & Society, 40(2), 335–352. ● Wendt, A. (2020). Quantum Mind and Social Science: Unifying Physical and Social Ontology. Cambridge University Press. ● Žižek, S. (1999). The ticklish subject: The absent center of political ontology. Verso. Electric Technocracy Pioneers Community https://zenodo.org/communities/electric-technocracy 37